Thursday, December 15, 2016

Too Close for Comfort

My first quarter of teaching English Composition, I introduced the research essay by telling my students that they could write on any topic of their choosing. My second quarter, I introduced the research essay by telling my students that they could write on any topic of their choosing—except the Illuminati.

I wasn’t trying to be mean by banning my students from writing about the Illuminati, but basically half my students would have chosen it as a topic, and it’s a conspiracy theory about a secret society that controls the world. It’s pretty hard to find meaningful research on something that’s being kept a secret. I mean, I guess if my students went undercover and infiltrated the Illuminati, but I could barely get them to show up for class, so you know.

But my students’ obsession with the Illuminati conspiracy theory illustrates how the classroom is just a microcosm of society. Studies show that Americans, in general, are obsessed with conspiracy theories. Almost 25 percent of Americans believe that the moon landing was a conspiracy. Almost 50 percent believe that the JFK assassination was a conspiracy. And over 50 percent believe that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy.

Regarding 9/11, some people believe that government officials had foreknowledge of the attacks. Some people believe that government officials orchestrated the attacks. And some even believe that shape-shifting extraterrestrials bent on world domination were responsible.

Considering that Americans largely embrace 9/11 conspiracy theories, based on her People magazine interview, Sarah Palin is lucky she escaped becoming the center of one. When asked what she was reading for fun, she said this:

“Do we consider The Looming Tower something just for fun? That's what I've been reading on the airplane. It's about 9/11. If I'm going to read something, for the most part, it's something beneficial.”

Doesn’t her answer kind of make it sound like she thought 9/11 was beneficial? At least at first glance? Of course, she wasn’t saying that 9/11 was beneficial. She was saying that informing herself about it was beneficial. But it just sounds wrong, doesn’t it?

Well, I thought it was hilarious, and I really wanted to include it in my book, but, alas, there’s nothing technically wrong with it. Maybe if I had a chapter called "Too Close for Comfort: The Minimum Number of Words That Should Exist Between '9/11' and an Adjective with a Positive Connotation." Or "Call Me Superstitious: Books I Would Never Read on an Airplane."

7 comments:

  1. Sigh. As far as Palinisms go, that one is low on the list. And we have a home-grown variety (Pauline Hanson). She has decided that Climate Change is a conspiracy. And is not alone.
    I would really like to sequester these people in an enclosed space somewhere (padded for their safety) and sound proof for ours.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Definitely the latter!
    It's fascinating how conspiracy theories grow!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's the problem with being a public figure; your every word is scrutinized. So this is why I'm not ever becoming famous. I stick my foot in my mouth way too much. :) Happy New Year!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jenny's back!!! Christmas came early!!!

    yeah in this fake-news post-truth world i go to wikipedia nowadays and am met with a note from the editor saying that they still consider the truth important. this makes me sad. i would so donate to them but i'm dirt poor.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is such a fun blog where Tina Fey meets Sarah Palin! I'm sure your students are crazy about you! Happy Holidays!

    Julie

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the human mind is evolved to pick out connections between things. Conspiracy theories are an extreme example of that.

    ReplyDelete